Bertrand Russell on Critical Thinking :: Critical Thinking Essays

Bertrand Russell on Critical ThinkingThe ideal of vituperative thought process is a central one in Russells philosophy, though this is not yet gener entirelyy recognized in the literature on critical thinking. For Russell, the ideal is embedded in the fabric of philosophy, science, liberalism and rationality, and this paper reconstructs Russells account, which is split throughout numerous papers and books. It appears that he has developed a rich conception, involving a complex set of skills, dispositions and attitudes, which together delineate a virtue which has both(prenominal) intellectual and moral aspects. It is a view which is rooted in Russells epistemological conviction that knowledge is difficult but not impossible to attain, and in his ethical conviction that freedom and independence in inquiry are vital. Russells account anticipates m whatever of the insights to be found in the recent critical thinking literature, and his views on critical thinking are of enormous impo rtance in understanding the nature of educational aims. Moreover, it is argued that Russell manages to avoid many of the objections which have been raised against recent accounts. With valuate to impartiality, thinking for oneself, the importance of feelings and relational skills, the connection with action, and the problem of generalizability, Russell shows a deep understanding of problems and issues which have been at the forefront of recent debate. The ideal of critical thinking is a central one in Russells philosophy, though this is not yet generally recognized. Russells name seldom appears in the immense literature on critical thinking which has emerged in philosophy of education over the past twenty years. Few commentators have noticed the importance of Russells work in connection with any theory of education which includes a critical component. Chomsky, for example, reminds us of Russells humanistic conception of education, which views the student as an independent person wh ose development is threatened by indoctrination. Woodhouse, also appealing to the concept of growth, points out Russells concern to protect the childs freedom to exercise individual judgment on intellectual and moral questions. Stander discusses Russells claim that schooling all too often encourages the herd mentality, with its fanaticism and bigotry, failing to develop what Russell calls a critical habit of mind. (1) The threat of indoctrination, the importance of individual judgment, and the prevalence of fanatical opinions all point up the need for what nowadays is called critical thinking and Russells work is valuable to anyone who wants to understand what this kind of thinking entails and why it matters in education.